By JOHN F. YOUMANS
June 13, 2005

 

Former CIA Director George Tenant’s promise of a “slam dunk” in providing the intelligence required to justify the war with Iraq was not only a pack of intentional lies and misrepresentations, it was also taken out of context.

 

So what did Tenant really mean when he told President Bush, “It’s a slam dunk?” We were mislead to believe that Tenant was saying he could produce accurate, reliable, hard intelligence and that it would be a “slam dunk” to present and prove it.

 

The part we didn’t hear, and it is important to understand, is what Bush said to Tenant prior to that statement. Tenant had already briefed Bush on the intelligence he had. It was weak, unreliable and frequently only substantiated by one source.

 

The president was “unimpressed” by the presentation and pressed Tenet saying his information would not "convince Joe Public" and then asked, "This is the best we've got?"

 

It was then that Tenant replied, “It’s a slam dunk.” It was then that Tenant promised Bush he would bend the intelligence and provide what was needed to convince Joe Public. He was telling Bush not to worry, he would take care of it. And he did.

 

The hard intelligence was molded, manipulated and fabricated to fit Bush’s preconceived war plan. Tenet, for his part, opted to become a political advocate for Bush's propaganda rather than a protector of the intelligence community.

 

Office of Special Plans (OSP)

 

Instead, a rogue Office of Special Plans was created and opened in the Pentagon. It took the hard intelligence from the CIA and others, and transformed it to what the administration wanted it to say. Tenet further ingratiated himself by remaining silent about the OSP. He knew the information Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld were giving out was false, but did nothing to disclose it.

 

The OSP was kept so secret even CIA senior intelligence officers did not know about it. The OSP was cherry picking intelligence and packaging it for Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld to take to the president.

 

Fixed Intelligence

 

Some examples of this fabricated intelligence:
1. “Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.” -Dick Cheney, August 26, 2002
2. “Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent.” - George W. Bush, January 28, 2003
3. “Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.” -
George W. Bush, March 17, 2003
4. “For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction because it was the one reason everyone could agree on.” - Paul Wolfowitz, May 28, 2003
5. “Saddam possesses enough anthrax and potentially enough technology to send unmanned aircraft on spray attacks that could wipe out a third of the West Coast." - U.S. Rep Mike Rogers, March 16, 2003,
6. “We don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.” - Condoleezza Rice, September 8, 2002

 

Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski

 

Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, U.S. Air Force (Ret.), is an excellent first-hand source concerning manipulated OSP intelligence because she saw it happening. Her final posting was as an analyst at the Pentagon. Her writings provide a unique view of the Department of Defense during a period of intense ideological upheaval, as the United States prepared to launch a preventive war. She states, “… the pressure of the intelligence community to conform, the rejection of it when it failed to produce intelligence suitable for supporting the ‘Iraq is an imminent threat to the United States’ agenda, and the amazing things I was hearing in both Bush and Cheney speeches told me that not only do neoconservatives hold a theory based on ideas not embraced by the American mainstream, but they also have a collective contempt for fact.” ( ttp://www.amconmag.com/12_1_03/feature.html),
http://www.lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski-arch.html)

 

 In another article she states, “… They spent their energy gathering pieces of information and creating a propaganda storyline, which is the same storyline we heard the president and Vice President Cheney tell the American people in the fall of 2002.

 

The neoconservatives needed to do more than just topple Saddam Hussein. They wanted to put in a government friendly to the U.S., and they wanted permanent basing in Iraq. There are several reasons why they wanted to do that. None of those reasons, of course, were presented to the American people or to Congress.” (http://www.laweekly.com/ink/04/13/news-cooper.php)

 

Downing Street Memo

 

Now, more than two years later, shocking documents proving the facts for war were “fixed” are still being covered up. The Downing Street Memo, written eight months prior to the invasion of Iraq, and other related documents showing the intelligence was fixed, is now the smoking gun. The Times of London printed this explosive document May 1, 2005. But it wasn’t until Prime Minister Tony Blair’s recent visit when he was asked about it, that it got any headwind here in the states. It is slowly receiving more and more attention here at home. (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1593607,00.html)

 

The memo reveals:
* Prime Minister Tony Blair chaired a July 2002 meeting, at which he discussed military options, having already committed himself to supporting President Bush's plans for invading Iraq.

 

* British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw acknowledged that the case for war was "thin" as "Saddam was not threatening his neighbours and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea, or Iran."

 

* A separate secret briefing for the meeting said that Britain and America had to "create" conditions to justify a war.

 

* A British official reported on his recent talks in Washington. “There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

 

U.S. Representatives Demand Answer From Bush

 

More than 88 U.S. Representatives have signed a letter to President Bush requesting answers about this grave matter. “Thus far, our search for the truth has been stonewalled,” said Rep. John Conyers. “American people deserve answers about this matter and should demand directly that the President tell the truth about the memo.”

 

Result of Fixed Intelligence

 

In conclusion, I will quote a mother who lost her son in Iraq. She criticized the United States' "illegal and unjust war" during an interfaith rally in Lexington. Cindy Sheehan of Vacaville, Calif., accused President Bush of lying to the nation about a war which has consumed more than $200 billion and claimed more than 1,700 American lives -- including the life of Army Specialist Casey Austin Sheehan. Sheehan ridiculed Bush for saying that it's "hard work" comforting the widow of a soldier who's been killed in Iraq.

 

"Hard work is seeing your son's murder on CNN one Sunday evening while you're enjoying the last supper you'll ever truly enjoy again. Hard work is having three military officers come to your house a few hours later to confirm the aforementioned murder of your son, your first-born, your kind and gentle sweet baby. Hard work is burying your child 46 days before his 25th birthday. Hard work is holding your other three children as they lower the body of their big brother into the ground. Hard work is not jumping in the grave with him and having the earth cover you both," she said.